[On April 24, 2019], Gov. Inslee signed into law the Responsible Teen Communications Act (SHB 1742), which protects teenagers from felony prosecution for distribution or possession of child pornography when they make explicit messages and images of themselves ('selfies') and share them with peers, and invests in evidence-based prevention and intervention strategies.

'Washington has a responsibility to protect its young people - and that includes protection from the lifelong consequences of unnecessary prosecution,' said ACLU of Washington Executive Director Michele Storms. 'This bill addresses irresponsible teenage behavior in a more productive way.'

A majority of teenagers use cell phones, and according to numerous studies, at least 20% of them use their phones to exchange explicit images of themselves, mostly with someone they are dating. This exposes a large number of young people to the threat of criminal prosecution for behaviors that could be effectively addressed in more productive ways.

Prior to this bill, teenagers who sent or received sexually explicit messages and images could be charged with distribution or possession of child pornography - a felony conviction that would result in a criminal record, sex offender registration, and lifelong barriers to housing, employment, and education.

The Responsible Teen Communications Act replaces those harsh penalties with investment in developing evidence-based prevention and intervention strategies that educate teens to make responsible decisions. It also retains misdemeanor-level criminal penalties for youth who share images of others. This will encourage teenagers to seek out adult help to guide them toward responsible behaviors and to prevent exploitation and harassment.

'Young people will make mistakes, but a teen who sends a naked selfie should not suffer the same consequences as a child pornographer,' said the bill's prime sponsor, Rep. Noel Frame, D-Seattle. 'By bringing state law up to date with technology, we are protecting teens from the unintended consequences of a law meant to keep them from harm, while ensuring that malicious behavior can still be punished appropriately.'

Many stakeholders advocated for the passage of SHB 1742, including the Washington Association of Prosecuting Attorneys, the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, the Washington State Coalition Against Domestic Violence, Team Child, the Washington Defender Association, the Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and the Justice for Girls Coalition.

Courtesy of the ACLU of Washington

 Share on Facebook

Share on MySpace!

    Share on Delicious

Share on StumbleUpon!